Pity poor Rand Paul. He really is just a sanitized version
of his father, Ron Paul.
By that it is meant that Ron Paul is unpolished, not
conscious of his image, candid, even brusque. He really doesn’t care what
people think of him; in fact, he wasn’t really interested in seriously
competing for the presidency, and was most concerned about crusading for his
brand of strident libertarianism.
He really wasn’t a Republican either, nor were many of his
followers, who proved it in November of 2012 by staying home by the millions
rather than vote for Mitt Romney, thereby paving the way for President Obama’s
re-election.
By contrast, Rand Paul, the junior senator from Kentucky, has
sought to conceal that very same libertarianism under a veneer of tact,
emphasis and context, preferring instead to reveal it only on issues in which
the people are really engaged. Unlike his father, however, he takes himself
seriously as a presidential candidate and seeks to use the Republican Party as
a vehicle to achieve that end.
There really is no substantive difference between the two
on the issues, including a decidedly isolationist or non-interventionist
foreign policy.
That said, Rand Paul knows what issues might catch the
public’s fancy and talks about them in a timely fashion. One on which he has played a key role is
the domestic spying issue connected to disclosures about the extent of
surveillance carried out by the National Security Agency.
Rand Paul has launched a petition drive seeking support for
a class-action lawsuit against NSA.
Because of the scope of the NSA’s activities, Paul
told MSNBC “every person in America who has a cell phone would be eligible for
this suit.”
“We now have several hundred thousand people who
want to be part of this suit to say to the government and the NSA, ‘No, you
can’t have our records without our permission or without a warrant specific to
an individual,’” he said.
This is God’s work, supported by people across the political spectrum. It is
interesting that this issue wouldn’t even be on the table — as Paul
acknowledges — were it not for the
revelations of former NSA contractor Edward Snowden, now a fugitive from the
United States.
Snowden’s disclosures led to a review of NSA’s
practices by the Obama Administration, which is expected to recommend major
reforms in the NSA surveillance program next week.
All of this suggests the criminal status the U.S.
has placed on Snowden might be inappropriate. Some people regard him as a
national hero. But that is another subject for another day.
No comments:
Post a Comment