Did you know that under Michigan’s
civil forfeiture laws, someone does not have to be convicted of or even charged
with a crime to permanently lose his or her cash, car or home
to law enforcement?
Two Michigan lawmakers want to do
something about it and have scheduled a meeting at 7 p.m. Thursday, Jan. 23 to
inform the public about the issue.
State Reps. Tom McMillin, R-Rochester
Hills, and Rep. Jeff Irwin, D-Ann Arbor, are both sponsoring legislation to
curb the practice.
Thurday’s meeting on "Civil
Asset Forfeiture Laws and Reforms" will be held at the Royal Oak Public
Library.
Speakers will include McMillin, Rep. Rose Mary Robinson, D-Detroit,
Shelli Weisberg, legislative director of the Michigan chapter of the American Civil Liberties Union, and Dennis Marburger, the Oakland County coordinator of the Michigan Campaign for Liberty.
Shelli Weisberg, legislative director of the Michigan chapter of the American Civil Liberties Union, and Dennis Marburger, the Oakland County coordinator of the Michigan Campaign for Liberty.
McMillin called civil asset forfeiture reform an
issue that crosses the political spectrum of left and right.
“Taking a citizen’s assets without a conviction
certainly seems unfair,” McMillin said in a press release.
Irwin’s HB 5212 would require a conviction before citizens'
assets could be kept. McMillin’s HB 5081
would bring transparency to the process. If passed, for the first time
Michigan citizens could see how often people's assets are taken without a
conviction and how the funds are used, among other disclosures, McMillin said.
According to a 2010 Institute for Justice study, Michigan
has one of the worst civil asset forfeiture laws in the nation.
Michigan earned a D- from the institute in its report “Policing for
Profit.” Currently, the government has to establish by a “preponderance of the
evidence” that a property was involved in criminal activity to forfeit property,
according to the institute. That is a much lower evidentiary standard than
what’s required for a criminal conviction, which is “beyond a reasonable
doubt.”
So if HB 5213 is enacted, it would
raise the bar, meaning prosecutors would need far more evidence to engage in
forfeiture, according to the institute.
Michigan has recently witnessed several
high-profile civil forfeiture cases. Two Detroit-area small business owners,
Terry Dehko and Mark Zaniewski, had their entire bank accounts seized by the
IRS, even though neither was charged with any crime, according to the institute.
Over $100,000 in total was taken from the two men.
An even more controversial incident
occurred when Detroit police raided and seized cars at an art gala.
No comments:
Post a Comment